This week's grammar post is short and sweet—a quick list of my favorite words that aren't really words.
1. Irregardless.
The
word you want is "regardless." I have no idea where the "ir-" prefix
came from, but please do your part to help banish it from the English
language.
YES: Regardless of the weather, the wedding will go on.
NO: Irregardless of the weather the wedding will go on.
2. Unthaw.
You can either freeze something or you
can thaw it. If you're "unthawing" it, you're actually freezing it, so
save a syllable or two and just go with "freeze."
YES: It took 5 minute to thaw the hamburger in the microwave.
NO: It took 5 minutes to unthaw the hamburger in the microwave.
3. Ignernt.
I
find this one quite endearing, for whatever reason. It always makes me
smile. It's the word "ignorant" shortened to just two syllables, and in
some regions of the country it is used in place of the word "rude."
NO: That ignernt driver just cut me off!
YES: That inconsiderate driver just cut me off! ("Rude" or "jackass" would also work in place of "inconsiderate.")
YES: That driver seems to be ignorant of the rules of safe driving.
4. Self-depreciating.
I know I've mentioned this
one before, but it warrants mentioning again. The term is
"self-deprecating," and you can hear how it's pronounced by clicking on
the little sound symbol next to the word at dictionary.com.
YES: Her self-deprecating remarks made everyone laugh.
NO: Her self-depreciating remarks caused her to lose value as she aged.
5. Flustrated.
One person from my not-so-distant past used this
term exclusively in place of "frustrated." I'm not the kind of person
to correct such habits, so I always let it slide. But just for the
record, it's not a word.
NO: I get so flustrated when my kids fight.
YES: I get so frustrated when my kids fight.
YES: I get so flustered when my kids fight, especially if they fight while I'm on the phone.
6. Flush out.
Well, I suppose you can "flush out" a bird that's hiding in a dense
thicket, but if you're talking about filling in missing details, you
want to use "flesh out."
NO: This is just a first draft, I'll flush out the story later. (What? You mean down the toilet?)
YES: This is just a first draft, I'll flesh out the story later.
And here are a few more:
supposably
ginormous
hugemongous
slickery
analyzation
impactful
disorientated
ecscape
sherbert (it's "sherbet")
perservere (it's "persevere;" skip that extra "r")
could of, should of, would of ("could have" is the correct term)
gruntled (you can be "disgruntled," but not just "gruntled")
p.s. I frequently use "slickery," "ginormous," and even "supposably" (thanks, Joey from Friends!) just to be funny, knowing full well that they aren't really words. But only when speaking, of course.








I know ginormous isn't a word, but I still like it...but then again, I like making up words to drive people nuts ;)
Posted by: Molly | July 15, 2009 at 08:30 AM
This is a great post. I have a few people in my life who choose to use irregardless and flustrated and a few others that you listed. I guess I'm always surprised that people thing these are real words. I'm from Indiana, so grammar errors are par for the course. However, I might say should of, could of, would of knowing that I mean "have." It's just said when people don't really know that they are not actually saying it correctly. Ignernt was a new one for me! I have not heard that before.
Posted by: Jennifer McGuire (not the CK one) | July 15, 2009 at 08:45 AM
I agree with Molly. Ginormous isn't a word, but it's fun to use. I think the key is knowing that it's not actually a word!
Posted by: Jennifer McGuire (not the CK one) | July 15, 2009 at 08:47 AM
You crack me up, Angie.
Don't forget "crick". My time living in Nebraska it DROVE ME NUTS to hear. It's a CREEK, people! Not an "i" in the word!
Posted by: Abbie | July 15, 2009 at 08:50 AM
HA! This post made me laugh! I hate it when people use words that simply do not exist! LOL! Although, I tend to correct more than I should! I must confess that I do use 'ginormous' sometimes, however, I use it knowing full well that it is not a real word. It's just a fun combination of words! Another one that drives me nuts: CongraDulations or Congrads. Really? It kills me!
Posted by: Jingle | July 15, 2009 at 08:59 AM
You know, I've always liked word plays and interesting word patterns (ie; There are 7 kids in my family and every other name has 7 or 5 letters respectively - I love knowing this, hee!) But until I started reading your blog I didn't realize that I also like correct usage of words. Not that I correct others, but I do get a chuckle out of word conglomerations or just plain made up words.
And I HAVE been known to use ginormous and kajillion and other such concoctions. I think Jennifer (not the CK one *wink*) is right they're fun to use if you know it's really NOT a word.
Posted by: Stefani | July 15, 2009 at 09:01 AM
I'm with all of you on ginormous! I like it too!
Jingle...congradulations is my pet peeve!
I also hate could of, would of, should of. UGH!
Posted by: Kim K | July 15, 2009 at 09:13 AM
This is my first time visiting your blog... and I think I'm in love! lol....
Your first entry, "irregardless," is one of my HUGEST pet peeves!
So are... Ecspecially (close cousin of ecscape), and "Fixing to"... also known as "Fin'na". As in... "I'm fixing to go pick up the kids."
This is great...I will learn to laugh about this one day! lol... But I do have to be honest. I use the word ginormous all the time.... and y'all. That one I'm a HUGE violator of!
Posted by: Sarah Martina | July 15, 2009 at 09:30 AM
...and my personal favourite.
The word is 'specifically' meaning related to, definite, distinctive or unique.
It is not 'pacifically' meaning 'how you would get to the USA from Europe'.
Posted by: geek_girl | July 15, 2009 at 09:31 AM
This list is great Angie! I sent it to my husband since he HATES when people say 'irregardless." I have also heard people say 'fustrated' instead of 'frustrated.' That gets to me. Also, 'whelmed' in the place of 'overwhelmed.' Can you even be merely 'whelmed?'
Posted by: Samantha | July 15, 2009 at 10:31 AM
You hit my two biggest language pet peeves: irregardless and unthaw. I just had a conversation with a co-worker about the use of "unthaw". He insists that unthaw is correct..."irregardless" of the facts presented here!!
Question for you: In hunting terms a field dog will flush birds for the hunter. I understand the difference and use of flush vs flesh as desribed in your blog today. However, I don't quite understand where "flush with" as in "flush with cash" originate or if its even considered proper use. Any ideas?
Thanks again for another informative blog!
Posted by: Marg VP | July 15, 2009 at 10:47 AM
I hate it when people say "anyways."
Ginormous was added to Webster's in 2007: http://www.usatoday.com/life/books/2007-07-10-dictionary-new-words_N.htm
Posted by: Myra | July 15, 2009 at 12:23 PM
probably my biggest made-up word pet peeve is "imput"... holy crap, not a word!
Posted by: Alissa | July 15, 2009 at 12:49 PM
Ginormous is my biggest. Pet. Peeve. Ever. As soon as I hear it whatever comes after it is tuned out. Irregardless is a very close second. I won't even talk about should of. Chills are going up my spine right now!!
Posted by: Holly | July 15, 2009 at 01:08 PM
The hairs on the back of my neck stand up when I hear someone say, "I put it over top the chair." They should say, "I put it above the chair," or "I put it on the chair," or "I put it over the chair." I will try to hear it as topple over, or over throw, or some other words that make no sense.
Can anyone spell voila? "Wallah" makes me think of Wallaby, or Galah, both of which are Australian animals and not an expression of surprise.
Posted by: jaineparr | July 15, 2009 at 01:20 PM
This post is hilarious. I don't feel so alone anymore. This week my son got a book from the library called Yours Truly, Louisa. Louisa the Pig signs her letters as "disgruntled" until the end when she is happy so she becomes "gruntled". Now I will think of you when I read this to him! (;
Posted by: Sarah | July 15, 2009 at 01:21 PM
"Did they go to the zoo?" Supposably.
I hate when people say "inhead of" instead of ahead of.
Posted by: Jori | July 15, 2009 at 02:10 PM
I want to come to your house and be your friend. I'm just afraid that people will start rolling their eyes at us, rather than the other way around. :O)
When we took my puppy to the Vet for his first check-up the Doctor said supposably. My husband and I looked at each other and knew that we would be searching for a new Vet as soon as we left the office.
Anytime someone says that "word" now we just look at each other and can barely contain ourselves.
Posted by: Lisa | July 15, 2009 at 02:38 PM
I so love your blog. You manage to point out so many of my pet peeves, but you do it so NICELY.
I use ginormous all the time, I love that word.
Posted by: Colleen | July 15, 2009 at 03:27 PM
Ooh, I just remembered another one that drives me CRAZY.
Each chuther. Rather than "each other." Why, people, why?
Posted by: Colleen | July 15, 2009 at 03:28 PM
Thank you!! :) I have to admit to loving ginormous, and I managed to christen our recently-passed cat Gigantor, because it truly was the only word to describe him and his personality. ;) But I did it knowing it's not a real word, so its not so bad, right?
Have you checked out the "Blog" of "Unncessary" Quotation Marks? Its a total crackup. People send in photos from all over the globe!
Posted by: Trude | July 15, 2009 at 03:42 PM
my mother-in-law always says boughten. drives me crazy.
Posted by: april | July 15, 2009 at 04:40 PM
I've heard many smart, educated people use "expecially."
I also heard on the radio that "ginormous" was being included in an English dictionary (I don't know which).
I've been guilty of "irregardless" and "unthaw." I think I actually said "de-thaw." Luckily I've had some nerd friends over the years kind enough to chew me out.
Posted by: Jimberly Harker | July 15, 2009 at 11:38 PM
'Disorientated' is actually a word - it's the British English version of your 'disoriented'. Just wanted to clear it up for any Brits who, like me, read your list and were confused!
Although it's a misspelling rather than a non-word, the one that gets me most is 'definitely'. It's the word I see most frequently misspelled in text messages. It's espeically unforgivable in cases of predicitve texting - if 'definately' doesn't come up in the dictionary, it means you're spelling it wrong!!
Thanks for your regular grammar columns though. They're always fun to read and so easy to understand!
Posted by: Nina Douglas | July 16, 2009 at 02:26 AM
Orientate and disorientate: two non-words I see in print frequently, guaranteed to make me sigh.
I've never heard flustrate before. The marriage of fluster and frustrate, however, strikes me as extremely useful and highly applicable to my life.
When I worked as a writer/editor for a semiconductor manufacturer, I initially corrected the use of transition as a verb. After a year, I gave up in technical documents and only corrected it in business/sales literature. Those pesky engineers wore me down!
Posted by: Susan Raihala | July 16, 2009 at 04:46 AM